Perodua’s first EV – and its first totally homegrown product – hasn’t had the beginning that the corporate would’ve hoped. Launched late final yr, the QV-E was saddled with not only a RM80,000 price ticket but in addition a obligatory battery leasing plan with a nine-year contract that patrons balked at, with gross sales solely reaching 182 items in its first six months available on the market.
That’s not a superb look for an organization that offered 24,480 automobiles final month alone. And it doesn’t assist that the QV-E has been haemorrhaging gross sales to the Proton eMas 5, which offered greater than 52 instances that quantity with 9,569 items reaching prospects’ arms over precisely the identical interval.
However Perodua is now staging a comeback with a large value drop for the QV-E. With a RM6,500 rebate working till September 30, the automotive now retails at RM63,499 with battery leasing – a greater than RM16,500 discount. The leasing price has now been lowered from RM275 per thirty days to RM215. For the primary time, the corporate can also be providing all-in pricing with the battery included, which can set you again RM87,499 – simply RM7,499 greater than the launch value that excluded the battery within the first place.
With that, it’s time to take a look at the QV-E versus Proton’s large vendor as soon as once more. How do the unchanged specs evaluate, particularly when reframed with the brand new pricing in thoughts? We’ll reply all these and extra on this head-to-head comparability.
Pricing now far more aggressive
There’s little doubt that the QV-E has simply develop into a way more engaging proposition. Whereas beforehand, the QV-E would’ve run you as much as practically RM110,000 with 9 years of battery leasing included (excluding rent buy rates of interest, in fact), this determine is now just below RM87,000. With outright pricing being solely barely greater than that, prospects have the luxurious of selection.
Granted, this nonetheless makes the QV-E a step dearer than the eMas 5, which even in its priciest Premium trim prices simply RM69,800 (RM56,800 for the Prime). But it surely’s a lot nearer now, and this repositioning additionally strikes the automotive away from the highly-competitive C-segment SUV market occupied by the likes of the eMas 7 and the BYD Atto 3. These are achieved machines that the Perodua can’t hope to compete, for causes that may develop into obvious in a while.
In a giant boon for current homeowners, their battery subscription value additionally drops to RM215 per thirty days, and they’re additionally entitled to a “particular refund” on their buy value of RM80,000. Whether or not the complete quantity can be returned stays to be seen, however it is a uncommon concession for many who already personal the automotive.
The worth reduce exhibits the disparity in present fortunes between Perodua and Proton. The previous claims that the discount comes as a part of elevated localisation, with the financial savings being handed on to the patron. Which may be true, however we suspect the corporate wouldn’t have made the QV-E a lot cheaper so quickly had its market efficiency been extra encouraging – this isn’t a agency that tends to provide large reductions when gross sales are good, in spite of everything.
By comparability, the sturdy gross sales of the eMas 5 – and lack of any actual competitors – imply that Proton has not been pressured to scale back the automotive’s costs, even after transferring to native meeting beginning this month. That stands in stark distinction to the eMas 7, which fell by as much as RM6,000 beginning early this yr because it continued to battle with the Atto 3 for sophistication supremacy.
This does sting considerably, however you need to keep in mind that the eMas 5 (by that we imply its twin, the Geely Xingyuan) is in-built large numbers in China, the place the Xingyuan is the best-selling automotive for the previous two years. In the meantime, the QV-E is at present made in such small numbers – Perodua is sort of a boutique carmaker at this level – that any financial savings from localisation will make a big distinction to the ultimate value.
With the eMas 5, it’s the alternative – Geely having to construct hundreds of specialized knocked-down (KD) kits for Malaysia may have seemingly resulted in price will increase, so it’s no large shock that Proton hasn’t lowered the value. Even with all that taken into consideration, nevertheless, the eMas 5 stays the undisputed worth champion. However will this stay the case as soon as we dig into the remainder of what the 2 automobiles have to supply?
QV-E the efficiency, vary benchmark; eMas 5 costs quicker
Early on, the QV-E notches a vital victory. So far as efficiency goes, it wipes the ground with the eMas 5, providing practically double the facility of even probably the most highly effective model of the Proton. Its entrance motor makes 204 PS (150 kW) and 285 Nm of torque, versus the rear-drive eMas 5 Premium’s 116 PS (85 kW) and 150 Nm.
It’s no shock, then, that the Perodua is pretty brisk, getting from zero to 100 km/h in 7.5 seconds on its approach to a high pace of 165 km/h. Proton – or somewhat, Geely – has spare the eMas 5 its blushes by not quoting a zero-to-100 km/h time, solely an irrelevant zero-to-50 km/h determine of three.9 seconds.
The QV-E’s benefit extends to its vary. Each automobiles supply their LFP batteries from CATL, however the Perodua’s 52.5 kWh pack dwarfs the eMas 5 Premium’s 40.16 kWh unit, which is why it is ready to journey a lot additional on the WLTP cycle – 370 km versus the Proton’s 325 km. A distinction of 45 km could not seem to be a lot on paper, but it surely might imply one or two further days of driving earlier than needing a cost. And on automobiles which are as range-starved as these, each little counts.
We must always level out that in China, the Xingyuan has simply been upgraded with a bigger 47.14 kWh battery, delivering a variety of 480 km on the Center Kingdom’s ridiculously lenient CLTC cycle. This could equate to a WLTP determine of round 390 km, which is just a bit additional than the QV-E (and demonstrates simply how far more environment friendly this automotive is). Will we get this greater pack in a while? We’ll simply have to attend and see.
The place Perodua has dropped the ball is in charging. The QV-E solely helps as much as a measly 60 kW of DC quick charging, which is identical as what the eMas 7 PHEV is able to. As such, it takes a yawning half-hour for the battery to be topped up from 30 to 80%.
The mix of a smaller battery and a better DC charging capability of 71 kW means the eMas 5 Premium is ready to be out and in of the charger 9 minutes faster, taking simply 21 minutes to achieve the identical benchmark. And whereas each will settle for 6.6 kW from an AC wallbox charger, the QV-E takes eight hours for a full cost, whereas the Proton will want 5.9 hours of your time to be juiced from 10 to 100%.
QV-E presents extra equipment; eMas 5 extra sensible and higher high quality
There’s no denying that by way of showroom attraction, the QV-E has the measure of the eMas 5, a minimum of the place the outside is anxious. Whereas the Proton’s jellybean form is a typical sight lately, the Perodua cuts a positive determine with its sharp styling, coupé-like roofline and hidden rear door handles. If sportiness is what you’re searching for, it’s not even a contest.
We will’t say which design method works finest for you – cutesy with vibrant colors, or jutting and aggressive – however to us the QV-E is actually the looker of the 2. Its kerb attraction is bolstered by the truth that it rolls on trendy 18-inch alloy wheels which are two inches greater than the castors on the eMas 5.
Each automobiles are shod with sub-par Chinese language funds tyres – Atlas A3 on the QV-E, Linglong Consolation Grasp on the eMas 5. And in the event you’re trying to change them with premium rubber from the get-go, as we might suggest, the Proton’s smaller tyre measurement means it’ll be less expensive to interchange all 4. Each automobiles characteristic disc brakes throughout and trip on MacPherson strut suspension on the entrance; the QV-E will get a easy torsion beam on the rear, whereas the eMas 5 receives a extra subtle unbiased multilink setup on the rear.
One limitation that hurts the QV-E is the variety of colors on supply. There are simply two, and each are pretty comparable pale-bluish metallic shades – Ice Blue and Caviar Gray. Alternatively, the eMas 5 might be had in quite a lot of enjoyable hues, together with Marble Cream, Quartz Rose and my private favorite, the recently-introduced Jade Inexperienced.
Step inside and at first look, the QV-E appears to be like to take care of its lead. Its inside options soft-touch supplies as an alternative of the exhausting plastics prevalent within the eMas 5, and it comes with such niceties as a powered driver’s seat and even a digital rear-view mirror.
Its 10.25-inch instrument show can also be bigger than the eMas 5’s slimline 8.8-inch unit, and whereas its touchscreen (additionally 10.25 inches throughout) is eclipsed by the Proton’s large 14.6-inch panel, you do profit from bodily air-con controls (with an auto perform as well). Each automobiles include wi-fi Apple CarPlay and Android Auto, though the Proton does get built-in navigation with a neat built-in charging map.
Dig deeper and the QV-E begins to lose its lustre. To start with, the eMas 5 is far more sensible – regardless of being barely shorter in size (4,135 mm vs 4,170 mm) and wheelbase (2,650 mm vs 2,680 mm), it presents extra legroom for passengers behind, whereas the Perodua’s sloping roof robs rear headroom. The Proton’s further peak (1,580 mm vs 1,502 mm) additionally permits the rear seats to be mounted larger, permitting for extra pure seating in comparison with the QV-E’s knees-up positioning.
The QV-E isn’t simply extra cramped for rear-seat occupants, it feels it too, with black headlining and tiny rear home windows proscribing outward visibility. Entry and egress can also be restricted by the small rear door aperture, which isn’t excellent news for these wanting to suit baby seats. Additional factors within the eMas 5’s favour are its pair of rear air vents (none within the Perodua) and the useful 28 litres of under-seat storage.
On the again, the eMas 5 trumps the QV-E with a powered tailgate, and as soon as open, you’ll discover a bigger 375 litre boot, versus 320 litres for the Perodua. The rear-mounted motor additionally frees up house within the entrance for a beneficiant 70-litre boot, so in the event you’re hauling durians on the common, the eMas 5 is the clear winner.
After which we come to the a part of the comparability that the specs don’t inform you, and it’s how the automobiles really feel inside. That is the place the QV-E actually begins to battle – sure, you’ll discover higher supplies, however the automotive squanders this benefit each by means of its design (flat dashboard, too-thick steering wheel spokes, too-small headrests) and the standard (tough part-fabric upholstery, swaths of low cost silver plastic, underdamped door handles).
Don’t get me unsuitable, the eMas 5 isn’t any Rolls-Royce by comparability, but it surely nails the fundamentals and has nicer fake leather-based upholstery. You can even go for an Alabaster White inside which, whereas simple to stain, lifts the atmosphere past the dour Flint Gray. The Proton could really feel prefer it’s constructed to a value, but it surely additionally feels (and appears) prefer it’s constructed to a better customary.
It’s clear that Perodua is a era or two behind Proton (once more, Geely on this case) in these areas. Some could also be extra forgiving of those foibles, however to us, these little issues mix to make the QV-E much less of a “correct” automotive, which makes the steeper value even more durable to swallow.
Security-wise, each the QV-E and eMas 5 are a lot of a muchness with six airbags and Stage 2 semi-autonomous driving features comparable to adaptive cruise management and lane centring help. The Perodua provides a rear-seat reminder that the Proton lacks, with a novel ultrasonic sensor for detecting rear occupants, somewhat than merely utilizing door opening and shutting logic.
Package depend is just a part of the story – of better significance is the precise security efficiency, and the QV-E is the one one to have scored a five-star ASEAN NCAP score. The eMas 5 has but to be crash examined by any international security company, however provided that will probably be offered in Europe and Australia because the Geely EX2, anticipate the standard Euro NCAP and ANCAP scores quickly.
Effectivity and working prices
Whereas the QV-E presents extra vary, the figures counsel that the eMas 5 is extra environment friendly, reaching 12.4 kWh per 100 km versus 14.2 kWh per 100 km for the Perodua (you possibly can blame the additional 300 kg for this). The caveat, in fact, is that these numbers had been calculated utilizing the automobiles’ WLTP ranges, and you’ll invariably devour extra power in the true world.
All issues being equal, nevertheless, the QV-E will seemingly price extra to cost in the long term, though its longer vary could give drivers extra leeway to seek for cheaper charging choices to scale back working prices. So it’s swings and roundabouts, actually.
When it comes to guarantee protection, the QV-E comes with a six-year/150,000 km guarantee, which the eMas 5 beats by having no mileage cap. Perodua touts a complete service price of RM2,520.50 over 9 years or 180,000 km, and whereas Proton’s service schedule is barely totally different (there’s an preliminary service at 5,000 km, which P2 skips in favour of a complimentary inspection at 1,000 km), even at 9 years and three months or 185,000 km, the eMas 5 is predicted to price simply RM2,275.15 in upkeep, which is a good saving.
Moreover, each automobiles (in the event you go for outright pricing for the QV-E) include an eight-year/160,000 km battery guarantee, with Perodua guaranteeing a substitute if the state of well being falls under 70% earlier than the guarantee is out. Proton hasn’t outright acknowledged if it presents the identical assure for the eMas 5, but it surely seemingly does so, consistent with the bigger eMas 7.
In fact, with the QV-E, you do get the choice of battery leasing, which Perodua claims guards patrons towards battery degradation and extreme EV depreciation. The RM215 month-to-month price covers any upkeep on the battery (not coated beneath the common service schedule, so no financial savings there), and similar to with the battery guarantee, the corporate will change the battery if its well being drops under 70% in the course of the lease interval.
Nevertheless, any battery substitute after the lease requires patrons to signal a brand new nine-year leasing contract, trapping you into one other lengthy cost cycle. You additionally must pay a steep three-month upfront advance cost of RM645 earlier than you get your automotive, though this does cowl the ultimate three months of your lease.
Plus, each used automobile sale must be both carried out by or facilitated by means of Perodua’s Pre-Owned Automobile (POV) service, and the brand new purchaser has to signal a brand new nine-year lease contract. And provided that the corporate doesn’t present a assured future worth for the QV-E, you possibly can’t be certain if its resale worth claims maintain any water, both.
Additionally, you will by no means personal the battery outright – even as soon as the lease funds finish after these 9 years, the pack will nonetheless belong to Perodua, for higher or worse. You’re additionally locked into your determination to lease the battery the second you set cash down; you possibly can’t purchase it after the actual fact, and in the event you’re an current proprietor and wish to change, your solely recourse is to promote your automotive and purchase one other one. All in all, the scheme simply doesn’t appear definitely worth the bother.
All this goes on high of the truth that the eMas 5 Premium is usefully cheaper to purchase outright than the QV-E within the first place, to the tune of RM17,699. This covers a superb chunk (if not all) of the price of a battery substitute, so you possibly can successfully purchase three batteries for the value of a QV-E – the one which comes with the automotive, a free substitute beneath guarantee if the primary one dips under 70% SoH, and one other substitute after that. If that’s not sufficient of a safeguard towards battery degradation, I don’t know what’s.
Ultimate verdict
On the finish of the day, which among the many Perodua QV-E and Proton eMas 5 is finest for you is dependent upon what you’re searching for. If it’s all-out efficiency and vary you’re after, then the QV-E wins, arms down. For the cash, it will get nearer to the category above (eMas 7, Atto 3) in these areas, though it stumbles relating to charging speeds.
However in a reversal of roles, it’s the Proton that’s the extra sensible selection. Fairly aside from the truth that it’s less expensive to purchase, the eMas 5 Premium ought to price much less to run and presents extra space for passengers and baggage, plus it’s quicker to cost.
It’s additionally exhausting to overstate the gulf in high quality between the 2 automobiles, which is much less of a praise to the eMas 5 and extra of a criticism of simply how poor the QV-E is inside. Final however not least, there’s the choice of an excellent cheaper Prime to save lots of much more cash, albeit on the expense of vary (simply 225 km WLTP) and energetic security options.
There are different choices too, together with the eMas 7 Prime and the BYD Atto 2. Extremely, there are nonetheless tax-free 2025 items of the latter out there, and with numerous rebates and offers round, each might be had for not far more further outlay. They might ship a shorter vary at 345 km on the WLTP cycle, however they’re bigger and supply a lot nicer cabins than the QV-E.
Nonetheless, the QV-E does stand alone as Malaysia’s solely homegrown EV, which does depend for one thing. If you happen to can look previous its numerous faults, the most recent value reduce – and the flexibility to buy the battery outright – implies that shopping for one is now a way more rational determination.
GALLERY: Perodua QV-E
GALLERY: Proton eMas 5 Premium
Trying to promote your automotive? Promote it with Carro.
