Labour MP and former minister Tulip Siddiq has been sentenced to 2 years in jail in Bangladesh after being placed on trial in her absence alongside 16 different folks over corruption allegations.
She was discovered responsible of influencing her aunt, Bangladesh’s ousted Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina, to safe a plot of land for her household within the outskirts of the capital Dhaka, a declare she strongly denies.
Siddiq, who is predicated in London and has rejected the costs, is unlikely to serve the sentence.
In an announcement, the Labour MP stated the method had been “flawed and farcical from the start to the top”.
She added: “The end result of this kangaroo court docket is as predictable as it’s unjustified. I hope this so-called ‘verdict’ will probably be handled with the contempt it deserves.
“My focus has all the time been my constituents in Hampstead and Highgate and I refuse to be distracted by the soiled politics of Bangladesh.”
Since Hasina’s regime was overturned, prosecutors in Bangladesh have launched various wide-ranging authorized instances towards the previous chief, her previous associates and members of the family.
The trial involving Siddiq – who give up as a Treasury minister in January over controversy round her ties to her aunt – has been enjoying out in Dhaka since August.
Siddiq continues to face various excellent expenses.
Court docket paperwork included claims that Siddiq “pressured and influenced her aunt and the previous Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina utilizing her particular energy to safe [a plot of land] for her mom Rehana Siddiq, sister Azmina Siddiq and brother Radwan Siddiq”.
A prosecutor for Bangladesh’s Anti-Corruption Fee (ACC) beforehand stated Siddiq was tried as a Bangladeshi citizen as authorities had obtained her Bangladeshi passport, ID and tax quantity.
Siddiq’s attorneys have disputed she is a Bangladeshi citizen, telling the Monetary Instances she has “by no means had” an ID card or voter ID, and “has not held a passport since she was a baby”.
She was sentenced by Decide Rabiul Alam to 2 years in jail and a 100,000 Bangladeshi Taka effective ($821; £620). If she fails to pay, six months will probably be added to the sentence.
When the trial started, the MP stated prosecutors had “peddled false and vexatious allegations which have been briefed to the media however by no means formally put to me by investigators”.
A press release on her behalf continued: “I’ve been clear from the outset that I’ve accomplished nothing fallacious and can reply to any credible proof that’s introduced to me. Persevering with to smear my title to attain political factors is each baseless and damaging.
A Labour spokesperson stated the get together couldn’t recognise the judgement.
“As has been reported, extremely regarded senior authorized professionals have highlighted that Tulip Siddiq has not had entry to a good authorized course of on this case and has by no means been knowledgeable of the main points of the costs towards her,” the spokesperson stated.
“That is regardless of repeated requests made to the Bangladeshi authorities by her authorized workforce.
“Anybody going through any cost ought to all the time be afforded the precise to make authorized representations when allegations are made towards them.”
It’s understood Ms Siddiq will not be topic to investigation or get together disciplinary proceedings and retains her Labour Social gathering membership and the Labour whip within the Home of Commons.
Final week, a gaggle of senior attorneys raised considerations with Bangladesh’s consultant within the UK over how the trial had been performed.
Signatories to that assertion included ex-Justice Secretary Robert Buckland, former Legal professional Basic Dominic Grieve, and Woman Cherie Blair, a human rights lawyer and spouse of former Prime Minister Sir Tony Blair.
In a letter first reported by the Guardian, they stated Siddiq had not been in a position to safe correct authorized illustration throughout the trial, including: “Such a course of is synthetic and a contrived and unfair approach of pursuing a prosecution.”
The decision comes two weeks after Hasina was sentenced to demise in a separate trial over her function in a brutal crackdown towards the protests which finally pressured her from workplace in July 2024.
She was discovered responsible of crimes towards humanity over the deaths of an estimated 1,400 folks by the hands of the police.
That trial was held in Hasina’s absence, as she has been in exile in India since being ousted. She denied the costs.
Siddiq, whose mom is the previous prime minister’s sister, continues to face various excellent expenses in Bangladesh, together with two ongoing trials in relation to the allegations on the centre of Monday’s verdict.
She can be being investigated over the alleged switch of a flat positioned in a profitable space of Dhaka to her sister.
Siddiq and her household have additionally been investigated in relation to allegations of embezzlement round a £3.9bn deal in 2013 linked to a Russian-funded nuclear energy plant deal.
Siddiq has repeatedly denied wrongdoing in relation to the allegations, which originated with claims made by Bobby Hajjaj, a political opponent of Hasina.
Bangladeshi authorities have stated they estimate that round $234bn (£174bn) was appropriated by corruption throughout Hasina’s reign.
Responding to the newest verdict, the Awami League, the political get together which Hasina leads, described it as “solely predictable” and “firmly denied” the allegations towards the previous prime minister and her members of the family.
“The method fails to move any affordable check of judicial equity – some extent that has been made forcefully by each native and worldwide authorized specialists,” the get together stated.
Hasina additionally accused Bangladesh’s judiciary of being managed by an “unelected authorities run by the Awami League’s political opponents”, specifically the interim authorities headed up by Dr Muhammed Yunus.
Previous to Siddiq’s resignation from the British authorities, Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer’s unbiased ethics adviser Sir Laurie Magnus stated he had not discovered “proof of improprieties” following an investigation.
Nonetheless, he stated it was “regrettable” Siddiq had not been extra alert to the “potential reputational dangers” of her ties to Hasina.
Whereas Siddiq continued to insist she was not responsible of any wrongdoing, she give up her junior ministerial function so as to not be a “distraction” for the federal government.
The UK doesn’t have an extradition treaty in place with Bangladesh. It’s categorised as a 2B nation, that means clear proof must be introduced to attorneys and judges to authorise any extradition.
Siddiq was not compelled to return to Dhaka for the trial regardless of authorities there issuing an arrest warrant.
