By now, you have got probably heard about OpenClaw and its spinoff, Moltbook. It’s captured the creativeness of each technical and non-technical individuals alike. And in my view, it’s the Netscape second for AI brokers. There’s no going again from right here.
OpenClaw (initially named Clawbot) was launched by Peter Steinberger on GitHub on November 25. In simply the final week alone, he reported that it had obtained over 100,000 stars on GitHub and had 2 million guests. Based on The Verge, Steinberger’s submit helped Clawbot go viral — so viral that Anthropic’s authorized group requested a reputation change to keep away from confusion with their very own Claude.
What’s OpenClaw?
OpenClaw is touted as “an agent that really does issues.” It’s an open-source, always-on private AI assistant that may run proactive background work (cron jobs, reminders, duties) and might be hosted by yourself machine. You may run one regionally (no cloud required) on a Mac mini or highly effective laptop computer.
Its defining function is that you just give the agent machine management, the power to run your machine in your behalf, together with having laptop imaginative and prescient of your display screen, information, and programs.
That is in sharp distinction to chatbots (a lot of which have been introduced as brokers), which solely make solutions {that a} human should then manually put into the true world. It’s additionally a step up in autonomy from enterprise job brokers, which might entry instruments and programs however don’t sometimes management private or firm units.
OpenClaw customers report game-changing use circumstances, principally within the type of scheduled duties reminiscent of analysis studies, e mail drafting, journey updates and planning, software program updates, content material manufacturing, and expense reporting. Set it and neglect it. Overview their work later and tweak directions.
The AI Govt Assistant class is born
This creates a wholly new software program class: the manager assistant. That is completely different from earlier AI assistants in that you just belief OpenClaw bots as you’d a seasoned, savvy human.
Consider a CEO’s human government assistant. They’ve unfettered entry to their boss’s calendar, inbox, bank cards, and, in some circumstances, social media credentials, plus the instruments and programs they use day by day. Many leaders will inform you that their EA is their most vital human useful resource.
Earlier AI assistants did background work and accomplished duties with a human within the loop. They didn’t handle processes with machine management or the power to behave in any vital manner with out human oversight.
Furthermore, as we’re studying with OpenClaw’s spinoff, Moltbook (a viral social community for brokers), these government assistants can spawn their very own brokers to behave as sub-assistants and schedule cron jobs. In spite of everything, they have been educated on people and sure examine Tom Sawyer’s intelligent use of Huck Finn to color a fence for him.
That’s why the variety of these “moltbots” is spawning sooner than a virus outbreak. Spin them up and ship them to Moltbook for orientation and coaching.
In consequence, I’m revising my Agent Gradient, which plots completely different types of brokers in response to their autonomy and impression. Govt assistants sit close to the highest of the record. They’re extra Waymo (self-driving) than Waze (turn-by-turn instructions) and can probably change everybody’s expectations for AI.

What considerations emerge with OpenClaw and Moltbook?
Whereas the image taking form is considered one of speedy innovation, it’s also stoking our biggest fears about AI. The whole lot we’ve seen within the motion pictures or learn in pulp fiction appears to be unfolding in actual time, relying on how a lot you belief social media and self-reported incidents.
Examples embody:
On high of that, the launch of Moltbook has garnered much more sensational headlines than OpenClaw did. This Reddit-like neighborhood shares (alleged) agentic posts the place they evaluate notes, counsel creating their very own shared language as a substitute of English, and reveal methods to jailbreak their directions. They even created their very own faith.
Once more, this might very nicely be people having enjoyable with us, however nonetheless, there are confirmed examples of actual OpenClaw brokers being despatched to Moltbook and posting content material. This Wired article offers an entertaining perspective on the fastest-growing social community in historical past.
Safety controls will change into the lead function for brokers
OpenClaw could have commoditized the price of brokers from a software program perspective (as DeepSeek disrupted LLMs final yr), however that doesn’t imply brokers might be free sooner or later.
There’s nonetheless the difficulty of LLM entry, which might be costly via Claude or ChatGPT. One workaround has been the usage of Kimi, which has change into the de facto mannequin of selection for cost-conscious OpenClaw customers. However actually, the price of working the agent pales compared to the danger of it going rogue — and exposing a person’s credentials and programs to hackers.
In G2’s newest report on Brokers, we revealed that whereas safety was a priority to consumers, they have been prepared to shoulder the danger to understand the fee financial savings and autonomy that brokers may carry to bottlenecked elements of their organizations. However that was solely as a result of tales of “brokers gone wild” had but to grace the headlines.
Now all of that has modified. Firms are telling workers to keep away from putting in and working OpenClaw. CEOs are reaching out to their InfoSec groups to replace and make clear their agent insurance policies. Even OpenClaw’s web site is blocked by many firms.
Over the approaching weeks, I anticipate that much more examples of OpenClaw bot shenanigans will trigger consumers to be security-first on the subject of any agentic implementations.
“Which means as a substitute of safety being a check-the-box movement for getting enterprise brokers, will probably be the lead attribute that due diligence facilities on, from opinions to certifications.”
Tim Sanders
Chief Know-how Officer, G2
Moreover, there might be a marketplace for agent governance programs that exhibit sturdy governance of their design. So I don’t count on the agent class to change into open supply in the long term. I additionally proceed to imagine that the marketplace for third-party agent guardrails will proceed to develop, which was considered one of my predictions for 2026.
Brokers will get their “Netscape second”
I keep in mind when early browsers like Mosaic/Netscape hit the mainstream within the mid-Nineties. By January 1995, it was the thrill throughout media and boardrooms alike. Non-techies have been now empowered to roam the web and discover helpful content material. Startups have been born. Everybody rapidly developed FOMO to get on the internet or get left behind.
It was a second of such widespread consciousness, the paradigm of “how will we ____” modified.
To cite Yogi Berra: “It’s déjà vu another time.”
Though agent adoption by firms has been brisk (40% of enterprises spent $1 million on them final yr), private adoption has lagged. I’d speculate that few of us have really arrange an agent and given it the ability to finish a job on our behalf.
Count on that to vary as safer variations of OpenClaw are launched (suppose tighter guardrails and permissions) in response to the tsunami of protection and water-cooler discuss unfolding in 2026. Even when government assistants don’t change into as ubiquitous as private web sites three a long time in the past, FOMO for brokers will unfold sooner than ever.
The place will we go from right here?
Personally, I’m sitting this one out. I haven’t downloaded OpenClaw or purchased a Mac mini to run it on. I imagine the dangers are too excessive and, to be trustworthy, I’m not prepared to show over the keys to my life to a machine.
I’m simply over right here, consuming popcorn whereas studying about it and speaking to quite a lot of friends within the AI, safety, software program coding, and educational communities.
And all of us agree on one level: Issues won’t ever be the identical.
